School of Communication

Inquiries

News

September 25, 2006

The Australian "gets it wrong" on CSU Journalism course satisfaction

In The Australian newspaper’s Media supplement on September 21, a story and supposed league table ranked CSU Journalism as having the second lowest “satisfaction” rating among all journalism courses. It claimed that satisfaction amongst CSU journalism graduates about their course was only of 50%.

The story is both wrong and was not checked with the University or relevant staff, says Associate Professor Tom Watson, Head of the School of Communication .

“The satisfaction rating is actually 78% for 2005, based on a 71% response rate from more than 50 graduates,” he said.

Associate Professor Tom Watson has written to Martin Beesley, the editor of Media supplement and set out the facts. A correction has been sought.

The Australian got its story wrong. Instead of being one of the lowest ranked journalism courses, CSU should be one of the highest and more than 10% above the average “satisfaction” ranking of university journalism courses,” he said.

“At a time when many secondary students are making choices about university courses, this error could lead to incorrectly-informed decisions being made. I can assure potential students and their parents that the satisfaction of CSU graduates is very high, the reputation of the course in the media industry is very high and the level of graduate employment in journalism is very high.

NOTE: There can be no “league table of university journalism schools” based on the Graduate Careers Council of Australia (GCCA) data for these reasons:

top of page up