Key Performance Indicators
| INDICATOR | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Research Income (10%) |
$4.89m ($4.39m)* |
$4.05m ($4.55m)* |
$5.85m | $5.44m | $6.29m | $8.48m | $10.03m | $12.05 |
| Weighted Publications (10%) |
216.98 | 278.21 | 380.53 | 404.63 | 489.58 | 592.76 | 684.32 | 748.96 |
| Weighted Completion/Attrition Ration (10%) |
0.59 (43/73) |
1.08 (43/40) |
1.23 (48/39) |
6.92 (90/13) |
1.32 (50/38) |
3.5 | 0.73 61/83 |
TBA 75 |
| Number of Rural & Regional Grants (5%) |
144 | 136 | 130 | 124 | 164 | 144 | 137 | TBA |
| No. of Research Productive Staff (10%) |
N/A | 160 | 178 | 188 | 222 | 272 | 282 | NA |
| CSU Ranking on RQ/IGS Funding (31 or higher**) IGS ÷ No. staff Gross amount |
34 32 |
34 32 |
35 31 |
35 30 |
35 31 |
35 30 |
35 |
34 |
* One million dollars funding for the ARC Special Research Centre was reported in 2000 but should have been halved across 2000 and 2001.
** For 2000-2002 IGS funding was capped at 1999 Benchmark + or - 5% therefore an increase in ranking due to improved performance is very difficult.
(x%): target in terms of per annum increase N/A: No data available

