Multimedia has been adopted quickly in the educational and marketing environments. Its benefits can also be exploited in the technical arena. Not only does the effectiveness of the information improve, but new business efficiencies and cost savings are also realised.
By adopting multimedia publishing, organisations can improve dramatically the quality and effectiveness of their technical literature and, for the first time, enjoy quick and concise statistical feedback on the usage patterns of their audience.
Whilst technology itself has benefited from orders of magnitude improvement in performance, integration and automation, the media via which it is described, have changed hardly at all.
Researchers into human factors have known for a long time the importance of all five senses, specifically as they relate to the process of communication. Dilts (1983) and McLuhan (1964) both identified the cultural bias toward typography, to the exclusion of the other senses or representational systems, as Dilts calls them.
It can be argued that regardless of the perceived benefits, it has in the past been impractical to provide much beyond printed manuals. Multimedia has changed this almost overnight. The education and marketing sectors quickly recognised the obvious benefits of multimedia's ability to engage other representational systems. It is time now for the technical publishing industry to follow suit.
There is now no practical impediment to the production and delivery of technical documentation in multimedia format. There is also no financial penalty for doing so.
Without the use of multimedia, the costs in money and time of disseminating information about complex technical systems will start to become the limiting factor in the acceptance and uptake of these new systems.
For a moderate size documentation release, the cost of a 1000-page laser printed ring-bound manual is about twice the cost of releasing the same data on CD-ROM. This does not include professional printing and binding costs, nor shipping costs. A CD-ROM writer and software costs about as much as a medium size laser printer.
With respect to training, the traditional approach has been to deliver user documentation and, in some cases, offer an optional training course. More often than not, the course would come with its own training manual and require a live presenter. Multimedia now presents the opportunity for the user documentation to be an integral computer-based training course as well.
The real advantages start to come when we begin to add the other multimedia elements to the documentation. Colour photographs and diagrams can be added without significantly increasing production costs. We can also add video clips and sound bytes containing spoken instructions or maybe examples of audible alarms generated by the equipment.
Harrison (1995) has quantified some of the improvements in comprehension and reductions in errors that multimedia style documentation can provide. She concludes that properly designed multimedia documentation will normally produce faster, more accurate comprehension and less operator error than plain printed documentation.
Commercial software is being released with usage-tracking code built in because of the extremely valuable and objective data it can provide. No amount of questionnaires or user focus groups can provide such accurate and quantitative feedback.
By adding a feedback button to the end of each page of an HTML document, the user can quickly and easily provide qualitative feedback via e-mail.
In the case of documentation accessed via a web server, accurate, quantitative detail of usage patterns can be obtained by counting the number of times pages are accessed. For a technical writer, it is just as important to know at what users aren't looking. This is the first time there has been a practical way to discover such information.
Nielsen (1996) has observed that the way users browse hypertext documentation has an effect on how much content they are prepared to deal with at any particular level. He states that, on average, a user's reading speed from the screen is about 25% slower than from a printed page and recommends that the text content be reduced by 50% to compensate effectively for this. These findings also suggest that attention should be paid to the text sizes chosen for the display; screen resolutions are generally at least four times lower than that of a laser-printed page.
The new communication issues for technical documentation are only part of the larger issue of how technology is inevitably requiring its creators and users to alter the way they interact with it and each other. We can only hope to escape the proverbial 'software tar pit' when the work practices and paradigms used by development teams make the same sort of quantum shift that hardware regularly goes through.
By changing radically the way we communicate information, we may be able also to pave the way for new approaches to work practices and increased efficiencies. In the future, it will be the way we go about our work that will determine whether technology serves us or enslaves us.
Return to Conference Proceedings