Course types and considerations

Across the higher education sector, there is no single, consistently applied definition of micro-credentials and short courses. While national frameworks provide high-level guidance, institutions interpret and operationalise these offerings differently based on learner needs, regulatory context, and strategic priorities.

At Charles Sturt University, micro-credentials and short courses are defined through a practical, learner-centred framework that distinguishes offerings based on learning intent, assessment expectations, recognition, and governance requirements. This approach supports consistent design, delivery, and decision-making across faculties and central teams.

How Charles Sturt Classifies Micro-credentials and Short Courses
Rather than classifying offerings by delivery mode (online, intensive, blended), Charles Sturt uses a progressive learning and recognition model. This model reflects increasing learning effort, assessment rigour, and the strength of the claim a learner can make on completion.
The progression can be summarised as:
Participation → Learning → Verified Capability → Award Credit
To support clarity and proportionate governance, offerings are grouped into four Types (Type A–D). Each Type represents a distinct point along this continuum and carries different expectations for academic oversight and quality assurance.

How Charles Sturt classifies Micro-credentials and Short Courses

Rather than classifying offerings by delivery mode (online, intensive, blended), Charles Sturt uses a progressive learning and recognition model. This model reflects increasing learning effort, assessment rigour, and the strength of the claim a learner can make on completion.

The progression can be summarised as:

Participation → Learning → Verified Capability → Award Credit

To support clarity and proportionate governance, offerings are grouped into four Types (Type A–D). Each Type represents a distinct point along this continuum and carries different expectations for academic oversight and quality assurance.

Type A

Focus: Participation-based learning

Claim: Participation in professional learning

Volume: 1–10 hours

Credit: Non-award

Recognition: Attendance

Type B

Focus: Knowledge-building learning

Claim: Understanding of a topic or skill area

Volume: 5–25 hours

Credit: Non-award

Recognition: Certificate of completion

Type C

Focus: Capability-verified learning

Claim: Demonstrated competence against defined outcomes

Volume: 25–75 hours

Credit: Non-award (may articulate)

Recognition: Digital badge with evidence

Type D

Focus: Award-credit learning

Claim: Completion of an assessed subject contributing to a degree

Volume: 40–60+ hours

Credit: Award credit

Recognition: Academic transcript

What Each Type Means

Type A offerings enable learners to participate in professional learning activities where the primary outcome is exposure to ideas, practices, or updates in a field. These offerings do not assess competence or capability.

Common examples include workshops, webinars, and facilitated professional learning sessions.

Type B offerings are structured learning experiences designed to build understanding of a defined topic or skill area. While they may include learning activities and formative tasks, they do not provide verified evidence of capability.

Common examples include short courses, self-paced learning packages, and curated learning modules.

Type C offerings require learners to demonstrate defined skills or capabilities against explicit criteria. Assessment is designed to produce defensible evidence of competence, allowing learners to make a verified skills claim.

These offerings are commonly referred to as stand-alone micro-credentials. While they do not carry award credit by default, they may be considered for credit recognition through separate academic processes.

Type D offerings are formal subjects approved through Charles Sturt’s curriculum governance processes. They are credit-bearing and contribute directly to the completion of a higher education award.

These offerings are commonly referred to as micro-subjects.

Governance and Approval Considerations

Governance and quality assurance requirements increase in line with the strength of the learning claim and associated institutional risk. Approval pathways are proportionate to the Type of offering.

TypeOfferingPrimary approval approachWho is involved
Type AProfessional DevelopmentOperational approvalCentral team or unit owner
Type BShort CourseLight academic endorsementFaculty lead with central oversight
Type CStand-alone Micro-credentialAcademic design approval and quality assuranceFaculty SME, DLT QA
Type DMicro-subjectFormal curriculum approvalFaculty committees, Academic Board

HIDDEN Considerations

At Charles Sturt, we are focused on providing high quality viable skills-focused micros and short courses that address industry needs and are appealing and enjoyable for participants. If you have identified an opportunity to develop a microcredential or short course that aligns to our strategic direction, the Division of Learning and Teaching can support you. As the Academic Lead you will also need to commit some workload to contribute to this and have content available to use.

  • Have you identified a need in the industry?
  • Will this be of interest to an organisation to purchase for their staff/members?
  • Have you identified a significant potential market?
  • Is there an opportunity to build confidence and generate interest in prospective students to study at Charles Sturt?
  • Is there an emerging opportunity that strongly aligns to our mission or will contribute to our strategic objectives
  • Have you got an industry partner wanting to co-design a micro or short course with us?
  • Has your research uncovered a need for further learning in a particular cohort?

To be suitable for this distinctive type of learner that has quite different needs, expectations, and motivations from our degree students, micros and short courses need to be easy to digest, very accessible to participants that are usually time poor and able to be very focussed to efficiently deliver on the practical skills the learner is looking to obtain.  For example it must be at an appropriate level and volume of learning for this short form of educational product. It must also be open access and meet copyright requirements for micro-credentials and short courses. As learners enrolled in micro-credentials or short courses are not considered to be award students of Charles Sturt it is not permissible to reuse copyrighted materials or Leganto reading lists.

Ideally you have identified existing content that can be drawn from.

The preferred method of delivery for these courses is asynchronous, ensuring maximum flexibility for the learner and minimising costs to support increased viability for the university. The design will include engaging activities and resources in a variety of formats such as short, sharp videos (3-5 minutes), podcasts, interactive activities, recorded guest presentations, quizzes, practical and reflective exercises.

The number of topics and concepts covered will need to be appropriate to the total volume of learning the participant is expecting to undertake to successfully complete the micro or short course.

Once the micro has the green light to progress to design stage, you will need to commit to a minimum of around 50 hours.  This includes one full week for the design sprint and time in the following four weeks of the development phase. This includes approximately six one hour meetings to work with your Educational Designer to finalise content, and a weekly sprint team stand up meeting to track progress and address blockers and issues to finalising the course and course site, enrolment and pricing information and marketing and communication strategy.  Additional information and input may include communication with external stakeholders, sourcing industry partners, drafting welcome and marketing video scripts, providing content for marketing assets such as the online course brochure, providing meta data for badging and governance documentation. You will also be required for some initial consultation, and to review and QA the course and marketing material. Depending on the final course design and schedule you may also need time to deliver the course.

The micros team will lead and support the process. In addition to an academic lead you may also have industry partners co-designing or other internal stakeholders participating in some way. We consult with industry experts and prospective learners through a series of 15-30 minute interviews during the design sprint week.

A deliverable in the design sprint is undertaking viability modelling.  Costs for design, development, marketing, payment to additional guest presenters and other associated activities are including in this modelling.  The likely revenue able to be generated is estimated based on market analysis and learnings across the week and factored across a three-year lifecycle for the product and becomes a key performance indicator for the course.  The breakeven point, margin and total profit or loss is considered as part of the business case presented to the DVC (Academic) for final approval. The general principle is that the course must cover costs and generate a profit. Revenue is allocated under the University’s approved funding model.

As part of your formal proposal, you will need to:

HIDDEN How to progress your micro or short course

If you are ready to progress your idea for a new micro or short course the next step is to lodge a formal request.

For micro subjects you will need to follow the usual governance approval process as for any award course or subject. Once approved, log a Cherwell request to the Design, Development and Review team.

For a standalone microcredential or short course, complete a proposal, secure your required workload allocation, and get approval from your Head of School or equivalent unit head.

For a Professional Development event or webinar these are usually designed by the relevant academic or other product owner.  If wanting to use BrightSpace micro site to facilitate registration and payment, email microcredentials@csu.edu.au. A Cherwell request can be logged to get general Design, Development and Review support if required.

HIDDEN Students and participants

For the purposes of our micros and short courses it is important to consider who your intended audience is and their specific needs.

A "student" is a person who applies to study an award course on the HESF basis of admission. The university assesses the application and makes a formal offer accepted by the applicant. In making an offer there are a range of criteria the university must apply. Students are recorded in our Student Management System and are entitled to full access to applicable university support and resources.

A "participant" is any person who chooses to register and pay for a non award micro, short course or other professional development activity such as events and webinars.  In the case of our micros and short courses they register through our payment gateway in Bright Space and on this basis are granted access to their course. They have access to a range of support and resources, however will not have access to some copyrighted materials or Leganto reading lists in accordance with the university's licensing agreements.

Participants of our micros and short courses are looking for bite sized, skills focused learning that can be easily accessed, engaged with and digested.

HIDDEN

Students and participants

For the purposes of our micros and short courses it is important to consider who your intended audience is and their specific needs.

A "student" is a person who applies to study an award course on the HESF basis of admission. The university assesses the application and makes a formal offer accepted by the applicant. In making an offer there are a range of criteria the university must apply. Students are recorded in our Student Management System and are entitled to full access to applicable university support and resources.

A "participant" is any person who chooses to register and pay for a non award micro, short course or other professional development activity such as events and webinars.  In the case of our micros and short courses they register through our payment gateway in Bright Space and on this basis are granted access to their course. They have access to a range of support and resources, however will not have access to some copyrighted materials or Leganto reading lists in accordance with the university's licensing agreements.

Participants of our micros and short courses are looking for bite sized, skills focussed learning that can be easily accessed, engaged with and digested.

More information

For more information about microcredentials and short courses, please email the team at microcredentials@csu.edu.au